"Gamers don't have to be your audience" " Gamers are Dead" "A Guide to Ending Gamers" you've probably heard some variation of that throughout the duration of #gamergate and took it as a literal call to end gamers; well you are wrong according to the authors of the articles and proponents of that sentiment. It was meant as a klaxon to signal in a new breed of gamer, someone who is socially and politically aware enough to challenge the preconceived notions of society, to go against the gender norms, to think freely....but is that what they really want? From where I am sitting, the answer is a resounding no.
Majestic |
Vidya gamers ( that's video gamers for the uninitiated) are extremely socially aware, which is why we do not like where all this stuff is heading and have stood against it. We have seen what has happened when a poisonous dogma has been injected into different groups (Feminism, Atheism) and we do not like it because they are the antithesis of critical thinking and awareness; in fact, I'd go as far as to say that they view any sort of different ideas as an affront that must be dealt with...harshly. I know I sound a bit extreme but hear me out, if they want us to be aware of all the political/ social issues and apply that to gaming then should they not be receptive to different viewpoints? How can they say they want the audience to grow when anytime one of us challenges their assertions we are met with calls of misogyny or compared to various hate groups? A medium, nay a person, cannot intellectually grow when they are being denied water to nourish their thoughts. I have seen people like Christinia Hoff Sommers, an accomplished academic, get ridiculed for having a different take on #gamergate by the very same people who swear they want nothing more than inclusiveness and the expansion of gamers awareness. There are women in gamergate who constantly have their beliefs/womanhood challenged by opposition simply because they do not think in a manner they find suitable; but most commonly I see people get blasted for criticizing any facet of feminism (which somehow is always mentioned in #gamergate). Looked what happened when gamers started turning a critical eye to those that supposedly represented our best interests, we were instantly deemed misogynists that just want to keep gaming an all boys club and repeatedly slandered in the media...simply for asking about the ethical standards in video games journalism. In such an environment, how can they expect me or anyone to believe that they want gamers to grow when any time we show any inkling of being critical we are brow beaten with how terrible we are? The answer, to me, is very simple: they don't want us to grow, they want to mold us.
Just bear with me though |
Wait I'm sorry which group lacks diversity? |
I do not believe that they want gamers to grow, it's more beneficial to them that we do not challenge their beliefs. All of the actions I've seen lead me to believe that all the talk about diversity is just lip service to make themselves look/feel good because if they were truly about it, they would have opened up a dialogue and responded to valid criticisms or at the very least not attempt a multitude of silencing/shaming tactics for those who disagree with them. There is no growth that is possible in this environment and until I see notable efforts being made by these critics to allow for discussion, I will continue to take everything they say with a grain of salt...not too much salt though otherwise I won't be able to stop the ghosts from attacking. What? You think I'm crazy? It's Halloween time...you won't think I'm so crazy when the spirits are absconding away with you and I'm over here enjoying the fact that I'm still living.
-TTBN ( salt hoarder extraordinaire)
No comments:
Post a Comment